A limited number of standardized and methodologically strong study designs are being used to enhance our ability to compare test results across various sites and disorders. Specifically, members of the DSM-5 Research Group created two standardized protocols for the DSM-5 field trials. One version,
which is described in detail here, is designed for academic or other large clinical settings with established research infrastructures. In these settings, we will assess the clinical utility, feasibility, reliability, and where possible, the validity of selected DSM-5 draft diagnostic criteria as well as the clinical utility, feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the cross-cutting and diagnostic-specific severity measures. The second version,
described in detail here, is focused on solo practitioners and smaller routine clinical practice settings. This second design will assess the clinical utility and feasibility of draft diagnostic criteria as well as the clinical utility, feasibility, and sensitivity to change of the cross-cutting and diagnostic-specific severity measures.